Case title pending
Manuscript rejected twice for structural issues; restructured and accepted in a Q1 journal after one revision round.
We write, edit and validate scientific communication — for researchers publishing their work, biotech teams building authority, and digital health products whose claims need to hold. The distance between what your data says and what your audience understands: that’s where we work.
Anyone can write with AI. Few can tell you whether the science behind your message is actually defensible.
The hummingbird’s green is not pigment — it is structure. A scientific text works the same way: the same data can dazzle or go unnoticed depending on how it is built.
"A statistically significant trend towards amelioration of the evaluated parameters was observed in the intervention cohort, which could potentially suggest therapeutic implications that may warrant further exploration in subsequent investigations."
This is what we do: close the gap between the data and its reading.
"Our AI optimizes your nervous system through vagus nerve activation."
From our science validation line — claims that survive a clinician’s reading.
Every deliverable starts from the same principle: the structure does the work. We don't sell words — we build and verify arguments that hold up in front of a reviewer, an investor or a feed algorithm.
From data to accepted manuscript. We work with your results and your team so the paper says exactly what the evidence allows — and reads the way it deserves.
Your team knows the science. We turn it into material that builds authority over time: for clients, for investors, for the field. Judgement, not just presence.
AI made building health products easy. It didn't make the science reliable. We check whether claims, references and evidence actually support what the product says — before it reaches users, investors or clinicians.
Note: This is scientific review of claims and evidence — not regulatory certification or legal assessment. We'll flag when regulatory counsel is needed.
| Product claim | Evidence | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| "Improves sleep quality" | Indirect studies; acceptable if qualified | Defensible |
| "Reduces anxiety" | Weak or extrapolated | Needs rewording |
| "Detects early signs of depression" | Requires clinical validation | Medical device territory |
A sample of recent projects across our three lines. Much of what we write is published under our clients’ names or protected by NDAs — cases are anonymised.
Manuscript rejected twice for structural issues; restructured and accepted in a Q1 journal after one revision round.
Response to reviewers for a contested methods critique — all major points resolved without additional experiments.
Systematic review with a pre-registered search strategy — published in a specialty journal and cited within months.
Full submission package — cover letter, graphical abstract and journal formatting — accepted on first submission.
White paper for a biotech platform company — now their most-requested sales document, 18 months on.
Six months of LinkedIn ghostwriting for a healthtech founder — follower growth and inbound leads measurable.
Recurring technical newsletter for a diagnostics company — opened and forwarded across their clinical network.
Conference deck for a Series B pitch — the science sequenced to land with non-specialist investors.
Claim audit for a sleep app pre-launch — 14 claims mapped, 3 flagged as medical device territory, all reformulated.
Evidence dossier for a wearable’s HRV-based features, used in the company’s Series A data room.
Pre-launch review for a nutrition platform — reference check and user-flow audit before public release.
Reference check for a marketing campaign — every cited study verified against its actual findings.
Iridis was born from the conviction that well-written science is not a concession to popularisation: it is the standard to aspire to. We are a small team on purpose — every project goes through the same hands that scope it.
Latin genitive of iris: "of the iris", "of the rainbow". In scientific nomenclature, the genitive is the standard form. Three readings in a single word:
The hummingbird's structural colour. Not pigment: construction. Like a good text.
Precision of vision. Seeing clearly what the data says — and what it doesn't.
The bridge between science and those who need to understand it.
Complementary profiles: science, writing and strategy.
Short bio: background, years of experience, therapeutic areas or sectors of expertise. Two or three lines at most.
Short bio: background, years of experience, therapeutic areas or sectors of expertise. Two or three lines at most.
Short bio: background, years of experience, therapeutic areas or sectors of expertise. Two or three lines at most.